Thursday, July 10, 2008

would you rather....

have one of your arms be a harpoon and all of the fingers on your other hand be tiny harpoons?

or. . .

be covered with hair?


serious discussion only, please. and no fence-sitting.

4 comments:

Stewart said...

hair, or fur? I would need to get a whole body cut every month? I could always make my own paintbrushes, and could sell my luscious locks for money, how ever, I dont think that would be enough to live confortably.

harpoons are cool, cause they can poke, and nothing can escape you, once impaled, and that aspect of power and control is tempting. How ever, I'm not interested in the ladies that like being caressed by harpoons, so, although less lonely then covered in hair, perhaps more frustrating, because the greener grass, that one can't touch, is sitting right in front of you, complimenting the polish of your deadly appendages.


I pick hair. one can just cut it, and it won't rust, or poke your eye out, and if it breaks off, your not out a limb and/or fingers.

Tim Rauch said...

hair, it's just more natural.

Anton said...

Hair. That way you can still cut off your limbs and attach harpoons if you change your mind. If you choose harpoons, there's no turning back.

Harold Teitelman said...

harpoons. that way i could harpoon stuff for breakfast and eat it with miniature harpoons and play with fire.